Namespaces
Variants
Views
Actions

Dependent names

From cppreference.com
< cpp‎ | language
 
C++
 
C++ language
General topics
Flow control
Conditional execution statements
if
Iteration statements (loops)
for
range-for (C++11)
Jump statements
Functions
Function declaration
Lambda function expression
inline specifier
Dynamic exception specifications (until C++20)
noexcept specifier (C++11)
Exceptions
Namespaces
Types
Specifiers
decltype (C++11)
auto (C++11)
alignas (C++11)
Storage duration specifiers
Initialization
Expressions
Alternative representations
Literals
Boolean - Integer - Floating-point
Character - String - nullptr (C++11)
User-defined (C++11)
Utilities
Attributes (C++11)
Types
typedef declaration
Type alias declaration (C++11)
Casts
Implicit conversions - Explicit conversions
static_cast - dynamic_cast
const_cast - reinterpret_cast
Memory allocation
Classes
Class-specific function properties
explicit (C++11)
static
Special member functions
Templates
Miscellaneous
 
Templates
 

Inside the definition of a template (both class template and function template), the meaning of some constructs may differ from one instantiation to another. In particular, types and expressions may depend on types of type template parameters and values of non-type template parameters. 

template<typename T>
struct X : B<T> // "B<T>" is dependent on T
{
    typename T::A* pa; // "T::A" is dependent on T
                       // (see below for the meaning of this use of "typename")
 
    void f(B<T>* pb)
    {
        static int i = B<T>::i; // "B<T>::i" is dependent on T
        pb->j++; // "pb->j" is dependent on T
    }
};

Name lookup and binding are different for dependent names and non-dependent names.

Contents

[edit] Binding rules

Non-dependent names are looked up and bound at the point of template definition. This binding holds even if at the point of template instantiation there is a better match:

Run this code
#include <iostream>
 
void g(double) { std::cout << "g(double)\n"; }
 
template<class T>
struct S
{
    void f() const
    {
        g(1); // "g" is a non-dependent name, bound now
    }
};
 
void g(int) { std::cout << "g(int)\n"; }
 
int main()
{
    g(1);  // calls g(int)
 
    S<int> s;
    s.f(); // calls g(double)
}

If the meaning of a non-dependent name changes between the definition context and the point of instantiation of a specialization of the template, the program is ill-formed, no diagnostic required. This is possible in the following situations:

  • a type used in a non-dependent name is incomplete at the point of definition but complete at the point of instantiation
  • lookup for a name in the template definition found a using-declaration, but the lookup in the corresponding scope in the instantiation does not find any declarations because the using-declaration was a pack expansion and the corresponding pack is empty
(since C++17)
  • an instantiation uses a default argument or default template argument that had not been defined at the point of definition
  • a constant expression at the point of instantiation uses the value of a const object of integral or unscoped enum type, the value of a constexpr object, the value of a reference, or the definition of a constexpr function (since C++11), and that object/reference/function (since C++11) was not defined at the point of definition
  • the template uses a non-dependent class template specialization or variable template specialization (since C++14) at the point of instantiation, and this template it uses is either instantiated from a partial specialization that was not defined at the point of definition or names an explicit specialization that was not declared at the point of definition

Binding of dependent names is postponed until lookup takes place.

[edit] Lookup rules

As discussed in lookup, the lookup of a dependent name used in a template is postponed until the template arguments are known, at which time

  • non-ADL lookup examines function declarations with external linkage that are visible from the template definition context
  • ADL examines function declarations with external linkage that are visible from either the template definition context or the template instantiation context

(in other words, adding a new function declaration after template definition does not make it visible, except via ADL).

The purpose of this rule is to help guard against violations of the ODR for template instantiations: 

// an external library
namespace E
{
    template<typename T>
    void writeObject(const T& t)
    {
        std::cout << "Value = " << t << '\n';
    }
}
 
// translation unit 1:
// Programmer 1 wants to allow E::writeObject to work with vector<int>
namespace P1
{
    std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& os, const std::vector<int>& v)
    {
        for(int n : v)
            os << n << ' ';
        return os;
    }
 
    void doSomething()
    {
        std::vector<int> v;
        E::writeObject(v); // error: will not find P1::operator<<
    }
}
 
// translation unit 2:
// Programmer 2 wants to allow E::writeObject to work with vector<int>
namespace P2
{
    std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& os, const std::vector<int>& v)
    {
        for(int n : v)
            os << n <<':';
        return os << "[]";
    }
 
    void doSomethingElse()
    {
        std::vector<int> v;
        E::writeObject(v); // error: will not find P2::operator<<
    }
}

In the above example, if non-ADL lookup for operator<< were allowed from the instantiation context, the instantiation of E::writeObject<vector<int>> would have two different definitions: one using P1::operator<< and one using P2::operator<<. Such ODR violation may not be detected by the linker, leading to one or the other being used in both instances.

To make ADL examine a user-defined namespace, either std::vector should be replaced by a user-defined class or its element type should be a user-defined class: 

namespace P1
{
    // if C is a class defined in the P1 namespace
    std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& os, const std::vector<C>& v)
    {
        for(C n : v)
            os << n;
        return os;
    }
 
    void doSomething()
    {
        std::vector<C> v;
        E::writeObject(v); // OK: instantiates writeObject(std::vector<P1::C>)
                           //     which finds P1::operator<< via ADL
    }
}

Note: this rule makes it impractical to overload operators for standard library types:

Run this code
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <iterator>
#include <utility>
 
// Bad idea: operator in global namespace, but its arguments are in std::
std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& os, std::pair<int, double> p)
{
    return os << p.first << ',' << p.second;
}
 
int main()
{
    typedef std::pair<int, double> elem_t;
    std::vector<elem_t> v(10);
    std::cout << v[0] << '\n'; // OK, ordinary lookup finds ::operator<<
    std::copy(v.begin(), v.end(),
              std::ostream_iterator<elem_t>(std::cout, " "));
    // Error: both ordinary lookup from the point of definition of
    // std::ostream_iterator and ADL will only consider the std namespace,
    // and will find many overloads of std::operator<<, so the lookup will be done.
    // Overload resolution will then fail to find operator<< for elem_t
    // in the set found by the lookup.
}

Note: limited lookup (but not binding) of dependent names also takes place at template definition time, as needed to distinguish them from non-dependent names and also to determine whether they are members of the current instantiation or members of unknown specialization. The information obtained by this lookup can be used to detect errors, see below.

[edit] Dependent types

The following types are dependent types:

  • template parameter
  • a member of an unknown specialization (see below)
  • a nested class/enum that is a dependent member of unknown specialization (see below)
  • a cv-qualified version of a dependent type
  • a compound type constructed from a dependent type
  • an array type whose element type is dependent or whose bound (if any) is value-dependent
  • a function type whose parameters include one or more function parameter packs
(since C++11)
  • a function type whose exception specification is value-dependent
  • a template-id where either
  • the template name is a template parameter, or
  • any of template arguments is type-dependent, or value-dependent, or is a pack expansion (since C++11) (even if the template-id is used without its argument list, as injected-class-name)
  • the result of decltype applied to a type-dependent expression

The result of decltype applied to a type-dependent expression is a unique dependent type. Two such results refer to the same type only if their expressions are equivalent.

(since C++11)

Note: a typedef member of a current instantiation is only dependent when the type it refers to is.

[edit] Type-dependent expressions

The following expressions are type-dependent:

  • an expression whose any subexpression is a type-dependent expression
  • this, if the class is a dependent type.
  • an id-expression that is not a concept-id and (since C++20)
  • contains an identifier for which name lookup finds at least one dependent declaration
  • contains a dependent template-id
  • contains the special identifier __func__ (if some enclosing function is a template, a non-template member of a class template, or a generic lambda (since C++14))
(since C++11)
  • contains the name of conversion function to a dependent type
  • contains a nested name specifier or qualified-id that is a member of unknown specialization
  • names a dependent member of the current instantiation which is a static data member of type "array of unknown bound"
  • contains an identifier for which name lookup finds one or more declarations of member functions of the current instantiation declared with return type deduction
(since C++14)
  • contains an identifier for which name lookup finds a structured binding declaration whose initializer is type-dependent
  • contains an identifier for which name lookup finds a non-type template parameter whose type contains the placeholder auto
  • contains an identifier for which by name lookup finds a variable declared with a type that contains a placeholder type (e.g., auto static data member), where the initializer is type-dependent,
(since C++17)
  • any cast expression to a dependent type
  • new-expression that creates an object of a dependent type
  • member access expression that refers to a member of the current instantiation whose type is dependent
  • member access expression that refers to a member of unknown specialization
(since C++17)

Note: literals, pseudo-destructor calls, alignof, noexcept (since C++11), sizeof, typeid, delete, and throw-expressions are never type-dependent because the types of these expressions cannot be.

[edit] Value-dependent expressions

  • is a concept-id and any of its arguments are dependent
(since C++20)
  • is type-dependent
  • is a name of a non-type template parameter
  • names a static data member that is a dependent member of the current instantiation and is not initialized.
  • names a static member function that is a dependent member of the current instantiation
  • is a constant with a integer or enumeration (until C++11)literal (since C++11) type, initialized from a value-dependent expression
  • alignof, noexcept, (since C++11)sizeof, typeid-expressions where the argument is a type-dependent expression or a dependent type-id
  • any cast expression to a dependent type or from a value-dependent expression
  • address-of expression where the argument is qualified-id that names a dependent member of the current instantiation
  • address-of expression where the argument is any expression which, evaluated as a core constant expression, refers to a templated entity that is an object with static or thread storage (since C++11) duration or a member function.
(since C++17)

[edit] Dependent names

This section is incomplete
Reason: the lede from [temp.dep], which is missing (id-expression followed by parenthesized list...
This section is incomplete
Reason: reword to maybe make it more clear (or at least less intimidating), and while at it, apply CWG issue 591

[edit] Current instantiation

Within a class template definition (including its member functions and nested classes) some names may be deduced to refer to the current instantiation. This allows certain errors to be detected at the point of definition, rather than instantiation, and removes the requirement on the typename and template disambiguators for dependent names, see below.

Only the following names can refer to the current instantiation:

  • in a class template definition:
  • a nested class, a member of class template, a member of a nested class, the injected-class-name of the template, the injected-class-name of a nested class.
  • in a primary class template definition or in the definition of its member:
  • name of the class template followed by template argument list (or an equivalent alias template specialization) for the primary template where each argument is equivalent (defined below) to its corresponding parameter.
  • in the definition of a nested class or class template:
  • name of the nested class used as a member of the current instantiation.
  • in the definition of a partial specialization or of a member of a partial specialization:
  • the name of the class template followed by template argument list for the partial specialization, where each argument is equivalent to its corresponding parameter.

A template argument is equivalent to a template parameter if

  • for a type parameter, the template argument denotes the same type as the template parameter.
  • for a non-type parameter, the template argument is an identifier that names a variable that is equivalent to the template parameter. A variable is equivalent to a template parameter if
  • it has the same type as the template parameter (ignoring cv-qualification) and
  • its initializer consists of a single identifier that names the template parameter or, recursively, such a variable. 
template<class T>
class A
{
    A* p1;      // A is the current instantiation
    A<T>* p2;   // A<T> is the current instantiation
    ::A<T>* p4; // ::A<T> is the current instantiation
    A<T*> p3;   // A<T*> is not the current instantiation
 
    class B
    {
        B* p1;                 // B is the current instantiation
        A<T>::B* p2;           // A<T>::B is the current instantiation
        typename A<T*>::B* p3; // A<T*>::B is not the current instantiation
    };
};
 
template<class T>
class A<T*>
{
    A<T*>* p1; // A<T*> is the current instantiation
    A<T>* p2;  // A<T> is not the current instantiation
};
 
template<int I>
struct B
{
    static const int my_I = I;
    static const int my_I2 = I + 0;
    static const int my_I3 = my_I;
    static const long my_I4 = I;
    static const int my_I5 = (I);
 
    B<my_I>* b1;  // B<my_I> is the current instantiation:
                  //   my_I has the same type as I,
                  //   and it is initialized with only I
    B<my_I2>* b2; // B<my_I2> is not the current instantiation:
                  //   I + 0 is not a single identifier
    B<my_I3>* b3; // B<my_I3> is the current instantiation:
                  //   my_I3 has the same type as I,
                  //   and it is initialized with only my_I (which is equivalent to I)
    B<my_I4>* b4; // B<my_I4> is not the current instantiation:
                  //   the type of my_I4 (long) is not the same as the type of I (int)
    B<my_I5>* b5; // B<my_I5> is not the current instantiation:
                  //   (I) is not a single identifier
};

Note that a base class can be the current instantiation if a nested class derives from its enclosing class template. Base classes that are dependent types but aren't the current instantiation are dependent base classes: 

template<class T>
struct A
{
    typedef int M;
 
    struct B
    {
        typedef void M;
 
        struct C;
    };
};
 
template<class T>
struct A<T>::B::C : A<T>
{
    M m; // OK, A<T>::M
};

A name is classified as a member of the current instantiation if it is

  • an unqualified name that is found by unqualified lookup in the current instantiation or in its non-dependent base.
  • qualified name, if the qualifier (the name to the left of ::) names the current instantiation and lookup finds the name in the current instantiation or in its non-dependent base
  • a name used in a class member access expression (y in x.y or xp->y), where the object expression (x or *xp) is the current instantiation and lookup finds the name in the current instantiation or in its non-dependent base 
template<class T>
class A
{
    static const int i = 5;
 
    int n1[i];       // i refers to a member of the current instantiation
    int n2[A::i];    // A::i refers to a member of the current instantiation
    int n3[A<T>::i]; // A<T>::i refers to a member of the current instantiation
 
    int f();
};
 
template<class T>
int A<T>::f()
{
    return i; // i refers to a member of the current instantiation
}

Members of the current instantiation may be both dependent and non-dependent.

If the lookup of a member of current instantiation gives a different result between the point of instantiation and the point of definition, the lookup is ambiguous. Note however that when a member name is used, it is not automatically converted to a class member access expression, only explicit member access expressions indicate members of current instantiation: 

struct A { int m; };
struct B { int m; };
 
template<typename T>
struct C : A, T
{
    int f() { return this->m; } // finds A::m in the template definition context
    int g() { return m; }       // finds A::m in the template definition context
};
 
template int C<B>::f(); // error: finds both A::m and B::m
 
template int C<B>::g(); // OK: transformation to class member access syntax
                        // does not occur in the template definition context

[edit] Unknown specializations

Within a template definition, certain names are deduced to belong to an unknown specialization, in particular,

  • a qualified name, if any name that appears to the left of :: is a dependent type that is not a member of the current instantiation
  • a qualified name, whose qualifier is the current instantiation, and the name is not found in the current instantiation or any of its non-dependent base classes, and there is a dependent base class
  • a name of a member in a class member access expression (the y in x.y or xp->y), if the type of the object expression (x or *xp) is a dependent type and is not the current instantiation
  • a name of a member in a class member access expression (the y in x.y or xp->y), if the type of the object expression (x or *xp) is the current instantiation, and the name is not found in the current instantiation or any of its non-dependent base classes, and there is a dependent base class 
template<typename T>
struct Base {};
 
template<typename T>
struct Derived : Base<T>
{
    void f()
    {
        // Derived<T> refers to current instantiation
        // there is no 'unknown_type' in the current instantiation
        // but there is a dependent base (Base<T>)
        // Therefore, unknown_type is a member of unknown specialization
        typename Derived<T>::unknown_type z;
    }
};
 
template<>
struct Base<int> // this specialization provides it
{
    typedef int unknown_type; 
};


This classification allows the following errors to be detected at the point of template definition (rather than instantiation):

  • If any template definition has a qualified name in which the qualifier refers to the current instantiation and the name is neither a member of current instantiation nor a member of unknown specialization, the program is ill-formed (no diagnostic required) even if the template is never instantiated. 
template<class T>
class A
{
    typedef int type;
 
    void f()
    {
        A<T>::type i; // OK: 'type' is a member of the current instantiation
        typename A<T>::other j; // Error:
 
        // 'other' is not a member of the current instantiation
        // and it is not a member of an unknown specialization
        // because A<T> (which names the current instantiation),
        // has no dependent bases for 'other' to hide in.
    }
};
  • If any template definition has a member access expression where the object expression is the current instantiation, but the name is neither a member of current instantiation nor a member of unknown specialization, the program is ill-formed even if the template is never instantiated.

Members of unknown specialization are always dependent, and are looked up and bound at the point of instantiation as all dependent names (see above)

[edit] The typename disambiguator for dependent names

In a declaration or a definition of a template, including alias template, a name that is not a member of the current instantiation and is dependent on a template parameter is not considered to be a type unless the keyword typename is used or unless it was already established as a type name, e.g. with a typedef declaration or by being used to name a base class.

Run this code
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
 
int p = 1;
 
template<typename T>
void foo(const std::vector<T> &v)
{
    // std::vector<T>::const_iterator is a dependent name,
    typename std::vector<T>::const_iterator it = v.begin();
 
    // without 'typename', the following is parsed as multiplication 
    // of the type-dependent member variable 'const_iterator' 
    // and some variable 'p'. Since there is a global 'p' visible
    // at this point, this template definition compiles.
    std::vector<T>::const_iterator* p; 
 
    typedef typename std::vector<T>::const_iterator iter_t;
    iter_t * p2; // iter_t is a dependent name, but it's known to be a type name
}
 
template<typename T>
struct S
{
    typedef int value_t; // member of current instantiation
 
    void f()
    {
        S<T>::value_t n{}; // S<T> is dependent, but 'typename' not needed
        std::cout << n << '\n';
    }
};
 
int main()
{
    std::vector<int> v;
    foo(v); // template instantiation fails: there is no member variable
            // called 'const_iterator' in the type std::vector<int>
    S<int>().f();
}

The keyword typename may only be used in this way before qualified names (e.g. T::x), but the names need not be dependent.

Usual qualified name lookup is used for the identifier prefixed by typename. Unlike the case with elaborated type specifier, the lookup rules do not change despite the qualifier: 

struct A // A has a nested variable X and a nested type struct X
{
    struct X {};
    int X;
};
 
struct B
{
    struct X {}; // B has a nested type struct X
};
 
template<class T>
void f(T t)
{
    typename T::X x;
}
 
void foo()
{
    A a;
    B b;
    f(b); // OK: instantiates f<B>, T::X refers to B::X
    f(a); // error: cannot instantiate f<A>:
          // because qualified name lookup for A::X finds the data member
}

The keyword typename can be used even outside of templates. 

#include <vector>
 
int main()
{
    // Both OK (after resolving CWG 382)
    typedef typename std::vector<int>::const_iterator iter_t;
    typename std::vector<int> v;
}

In some contexts, only type names can validly appear. In these contexts, a dependent qualified name is assumed to name a type and no typename is required:

  • A qualified name that appears in type-id, where the smallest enclosing type-id is:
(since C++20)

[edit] The template disambiguator for dependent names

Similarly, in a template definition, a dependent name that is not a member of the current instantiation is not considered to be a template name unless the disambiguation keyword template is used or unless it was already established as a template name:

Run this code
template<typename T>
struct S
{
    template<typename U>
    void foo() {}
};
 
template<typename T>
void bar()
{
    S<T> s;
    s.foo<T>();          // error: < parsed as less than operator
    s.template foo<T>(); // OK
}

The keyword template may only be used in this way after operators :: (scope resolution), -> (member access through pointer), and . (member access), the following are all valid examples:

  • T::template foo<X>();
  • s.template foo<X>();
  • this->template foo<X>();
  • typename T::template iterator<int>::value_type v;

As is the case with typename, the template prefix is allowed even if the name is not dependent or the use does not appear in the scope of a template.

Even if the name to the left of :: refers to a namespace, the template disambiguator is allowed: 

template<typename>
struct S {};
 
::template S<void> q; // allowed, but unnecessary

Due to the special rules for unqualified name lookup for template names in member access expressions, when a non-dependent template name appears in a member access expression (after -> or after .), the disambiguator is unnecessary if there is a class or alias (since C++11) template with the same name found by ordinary lookup in the context of the expression. However, if the template found by lookup in the context of the expression differs from the one found in the context of the class, the program is ill-formed (until C++11) 

template<int>
struct A { int value; };
 
template<class T>
void f(T t)
{
    t.A<0>::value; // Ordinary lookup of A finds a class template.
                   // A<0>::value names member of class A<0>
    // t.A < 0;    // Error: '<' is treated as the start of template argument list
}
 (until C++23)

[edit] Defect reports

The following behavior-changing defect reports were applied retroactively to previously published C++ standards.

DR Applied to Behavior as published Correct behavior
CWG 206 C++98 it was unspecified at what point semantic constraints are
applied when a type used in a non-dependent name is
incomplete at the point at which a template is defined but is
complete at the point at which an instantiation is performed 		the program is ill-formed
and no diagnostic is
required in this case
CWG 224 C++98 the definition of dependent types was based
on the form of the name rather than lookup 		definition revamped
CWG 382 C++98 the typename disambiguator was only allowed in template scope also allowed outside
of templates
CWG 468 C++98 the template disambiguator was only allowed in template scope also allowed outside
of templates
CWG 502 C++98 it was unspecified whether nested enumerations are dependent dependent as nested classes
CWG 1047 C++98 typeid expressions were never value-dependent value-dependent if the
operand is type-dependent
CWG 1160 C++98 it was unspecified whether a name refers to the current instantiation
when a template-id matching a primary template or partial
specialization appears in the definition of a member of the template 		specified
CWG 1413 C++98 uninitialized static data member, static member function, and address
of member of a class template weren't listed as value-dependent 		listed
CWG 1471 C++98 a nested type of a non-dependent base of
the current instantiation was dependent 		it is not dependent
CWG 1850 C++98 the list of cases that meaning may change between the
definition context and the point of instantiation was incomplete 		made complete
CWG 1929 C++98 it was not clear whether the template disambiguator can
follow a :: where the name to its left refers to a namespace 		allowed
CWG 2100 C++98 address of a static data member of class
template wasn't listed as value-dependent 		listed
CWG 2276 C++98 a function type whose exception specification
is value-dependent was not a dependent type 		it is
CWG 2307 C++98 a parenthesized non-type template parameter used as a
template argument was equivalent to that template parameter 		not equivalent anymore
CWG 2457 C++11 a function type with function parameter pack was not a dependent type it is
Retrieved from "https://en.cppreference.com/mwiki/index.php?title=cpp/language/dependent_name&oldid=146464"